Yes - my next step is to combine with data from the 16th to see the full passage of the second wave. As with much datavis, most of the work is in wrangling the data to give something to work with that isn’t too large for sharing.
Yes I agree there is scope to do some more filtering. I’ve already have a filtering in place that removes several hundred. This is based on the variance of pressure change values (exclude zero or very high variance sensors) and the logging frequency (high frequency logging requires a larger window to detect pressure wave and this is too expensive to apply to all sensors).
Trying to avoid bespoke removal of sensors while also avoiding those with a sufficiently good signal.